Hi,
We have to rehire a pensioner and pay pension (monthly) as well as salary (bi-weekly). Person was an employee before, got retired and changed employment status to retiree and is currently receiving pension through the pension payroll. In legacy it is done by assigning separate pernr for the pensioners so that processing is isolated between employee status and pensioner status of the same person. What would be the best practice in this scenario? Appreciate all comments.
Joe
Hi All,
New Jersey unemployment wage type /710 & /731 amounts are not calculating correctly for some employees who have transferred from NY to NJ.
The NJ calculated taxable wages need to take into account the taxable wages earned in NY.
The combined total of taxable wages should stop accumulating at $32,000 for the calendar year.
However, there are employees for whom combined taxable wages exceed this amount.
Wage type /718, /720, /724 & /741 amounts are calculating correctly for NJ employees and wage type /710 & /731 amounts should be the same as those four wage types.
When an employee changes his or her unemployment state, the employer unemployment taxable wages (/710) from the previous state are correctly taken into consideration when determining the taxable wages for the new state.
Max unemployment taxable Limit of New jersey is $32000.
Max unemployment taxable Limit of New York is $10500.
Here an employee relocates from New york (unemployment taxable limit of $10,500) to New Jersey (unemployment taxable limit of $32,000). If /710 for New york has reached $10,500 prior to the relocation, then /710 for New Jersey will stop at $21,500 (since $10,500 plus $21,500 equals $32,000).
Could you please provide some inputs for the above mentioned issue.
Regards,
Siraj.
I configured a employer contribution wagetype that would not add to gross and that would be taxable for Alabama and NJ.
But I notice that federal tax gets bumped up as well. The new processing class Z was done for AL and Tax type 1.
Should a HSA WT be expected to deduct taxes like this as shown in Case 2 ?
Please explain the reasoning behind this behavior?
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Case 1) When PCRL 68, 69 and 71 are all blank on the wagetype and no taxes are deducted; below is the calculation I see
BSI interface
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 01 FN: 01 PW: 4484.90 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 4799.47 YT: 718.10 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 4364.82
LUD MW: 4799.47 MT: 718.10 SA: 0 QW: 4799.47 QT: 718.10 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 55 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 339.51 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 339.51 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 339.51 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 56 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 268.32 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 268.32 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 268.32 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 57 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 339.51 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 339.51 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 339.51 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 58 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 717.35 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 717.35 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 717.35 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 59 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 79.40 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 79.40 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 79.40 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 60 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 79.40 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 79.40 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 79.40 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: AL NR: 0 RP: 1 RC: 1
HUD TT: 01 FN: 01 PW: 4484.90 HW: 88.00 MS: 01 NE: 00
ADD TE: 0 RN: 0 PW: 1.00
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 4364.82
ETC
Case 2) when PCRL 68=1, 69=2 and 71=Z are set on the new WT to deduct state tax for AL below is the calculation I see
BSI interface
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 01 FN: 01 PW: 4484.90 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 4799.47 YT: 718.10 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 4364.82
LUD MW: 4799.47 MT: 718.10 SA: 0 QW: 4799.47 QT: 718.10 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 55 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 339.51 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 339.51 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 339.51 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 56 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 268.32 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 268.32 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 268.32 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 57 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 339.51 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 339.51 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 339.51 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 58 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 717.35 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 717.35 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 717.35 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 59 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 79.40 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 79.40 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 79.40 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: FED NR: 0 RP: 0
HUD TT: 60 FN: 01 PW: 5661.40 HW: 88.00 MS: 02 NE: 01
ADD TE: 0 YW: 5475.97 YT: 79.40 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 YG: 5757.58
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5541.32
LUD MW: 5475.97 MT: 79.40 SA: 0 QW: 5475.97 QT: 79.40 PND: 0.00
ADC TC: AL NR: 0 RP: 1 RC: 1
HUD TT: 01 FN: 01 PW: 5484.90 HW: 88.00 MS: 01 NE: 00
ADD TE: 0 RN: 0 PW: 1.00
VDC AT: 0
SDC SM: 9 BW: 5364.82
ETC
When using the SAP program, rpupayus_sync_tax_data, and select Process Tax Authority Mappings only, I can do this in my DEV system as this is set for a development system, but is greyed out in my higher systems. How can I map these automatically using this, or am I stuck doing these manually in the higher systems?
Does anyone know what the table(s) that contains the mappings are, for each type, to manually create a transport for this? Tax Codes, Tax Types.....
Hello community,
If you have questions about TF 10.0, you can post this on this thread. We will update this thread with tips and notes related to Tax factory 10.0.
Thank you,
Kind regards,
Graziela Dondoni
Hi All,
We had to reverse an employee check for period 6/30 and re-do it because of termination in mid period. The system created a void rather than a reversal. Could any one please explain why a 'void' when we were expecting a 'reversal'?
Regards,
Aries.
We have employee's pre pay their Social security before beginning their retirement receipts. This is normally entered on an IT 0221 for the employee and processed. Part of that entry is the /TM1 & /TM2 wage types. In the past this has not been a problem; but they have all been salaried employees. We have our first long time hourly employee that will receive benefits. But it will not allow us to enter the /TM1 & /TM2 on the IT 0221 screen for the hourly employee. We receive the message "not permitted for EE subgroup grouping 1.
Can someone tell me why this is the case and what I would need to change in configuration to allow these wage types to be entered for this grouping?
Hi,
Currently we are deleting error messages in BSI system, by selecting one by one.
We have weekly and Monthly payroll runs, for every run system is storing the messages, now the error messages file size is around 11 GB stored messages from Oct/2014.
Instead of deleting one by one messages is there any process to delete these messages in Bulk.
Please find the attachment, here am selecting one one by one message and deleting the entries. Do we have any way to delete all these messages in bulk.
Regards,
Naresh.
Hi All,
I need to compare the - Number/unit field of two wagetype records stored on IT0014.
These 2 wagetype are used to store Election % and Max % per staff member on IT0014.
The PCR needs to compare the Election % with Max Election % and give an error if Election % is greater than Election %.
Please let me know the function or operation which can be used in a PCR to compare the ANZHL field between wage types.
Thanks,
Shilpa
Hi,
The client wants anything that is entered on the Assignment Field ( i.e Free text field) available on IT0014 and IT00015 master data of an employee to be carried over to the payroll results and then to GL posting document. Please let me know if this is standard SAP configuration or a customization will be required to achieve this.
Thanks,
Shilpa
Hi Friends,
I have the following issue can any one please look into this and let know how to go ahead as this seems to be an FI releated.
Thanks,
John
We have existing pay scale grades and levels in V_T710 that is assigned to jobs. We want to define new grades and levels that should be assigned to existing job of earlier grade and level Can we do that what is the right way of doing or Can we change existing value of payscale grade and level Will there be an impact on retro
We got a new rule An hourly wage has been increased ? we are in confused state there would be impact on jobs experts please
throw some light on this
While Canadian Income Tax changes are usually effective on January 1 and July 1 of each year, due to the summer election and subsequent budget in Alberta, there are changes being introduced as of October 1, 2015.
The tax changes are realized through the introduction of four new tax brackets (i.e. table changes). Given that the prescribed rate changes are effective Jan 1, 2015 and that the changes are being introduced as of October 1, the rate difference is being introduced at 4 times the difference in order to collect the full 2015 amount in just 3 months. Expect the rates to revert to the new values for the first pay in January 2016.
Kim LaPierre
Dear Experts,
We have run the latest payroll cycle (USA).
Some how system is adding a subtype of date specifications Info type for many of the employees.
Recently we have upgraded hardware along with Windows 2012.
What could be the reason for this ?
With out our involvment how a subtype of Date specifications has been added.
Please advice.
Regards,
Sairam.
Hi Experts,
One of Health Benefit plan is going to be unused from September 1 st on wards.
Delimiting At these steps are enough? Kindly advice.
1. Define Health Plan general data
2. Define Flexible benefits plan General attributes for health plan
3. Define cost rules
4. Assign health plan attributes
Please advice.
Regards,
Sairam.
We have an issue where an employee’s dependents (Child, Step Child, Child of DP) are eligible for benefits until the end of the calendar month that they attain the age of 26. Currently, SAP allows dependents to be added up until their 26th birthday. For example, a dependent with a date of birth of 08/15/1989 can be added to a benefit plan with an effective date prior to 08/15/2015. However, SAP will not allow this same dependent to be added from 08/16 through 08/31
To achieve this requirement, we Configured the same as
Step 3:
But it didn’t work.Please Help
whats are the steps to execute form 8027?
Experts throw some light on this
As an update, we (PASSHE) just had a call with the SAP Product Manager on the IRS requirements to deliver reports for IRS sections 6055 and 6056. At this point, SAP says that custom reports/forms would need to developed to meet these requirements. Based on our understanding of these requirements, specifically for forms 1095-C and 1094-C described below, these requirements will be very time consuming and costly for companies to address with custom reports and forms. However, if your company has already developed specifications for the development of these reports/forms, please respond to this forum. Likewise, if you do not have customization plans and feel these requirements should be addressed by a standard SAP solution like W2's, COBRA, New Hire Reporting etc., please provide your response as well.
Thanks,
Jeff Wible
ASUG HCM Community Facilitator
Director, SAP Human Capital Management Systems
Shared Administrative Systems
Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education
ACA Documentation Requirement Summary
Source: IRS.GOV. Bulletin – March 24, 2014 – T.D. 9661
Employee Statement Section 6056
Employer Statement Section 6056 (section 6055 self-insured) can be combined form
Hello Experts,
I am looking for some direction on a problem we are having. My business partners would like our benefit deductions for calendar year 2016 to calculate at 26 pays instead of 27 pays. I have attempted to create a new payment model and assigned it to our benefit plans, but the calculation is still using 27 pays.
So, I have created 2 new payment models one for Hourly and one for Salary. Also, I have setup the pay periods too, but this configuration I am not sure is correct? Then, I have assigned our benefit plans to these new payment models in Benefits integration.
Best regards,
Mike
We have a need to bring on new employees from a company we purchased effective 8/1/2015.
We are expected to produce their quarterly tax reports for Q3, 7/1/2015 - 9/30/2015.
We are expected to produce their W-2s at year end effective 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2015.
We were going to use /221 to load starting balances with an 8/1/2015 start date; however that results in an incorrect wage amount for the quarterly tax reporting because it is all wages from 1/1 - 7/31 (well thru 9/30 once we run additional payrolls) and it should be 7/1 - 7/31 (well thru 9/30 once we run additional payrolls).
With the employee not being active in our system until 8/1, we cannot have anything on their records dated prior to 8/1, do you have suggestions for how to can get the correct amounts for tax reporter to use for Q3 reporting?
Tawnya